Other Access

The information on this page (the dataset metadata) is also available in these formats:


Data from: Starch and dextrose at 2 levels of rumen-degradable protein in iso-nitrogenous diets: Effects on lactation performance, ruminal measurements, methane emission, digestibility, and nitrogen balance of dairy cows.

Dairy CAP logo

This feeding trial was designed to investigate two separate questions. The first question is, “What are the effects of substituting two non-fiber carbohydrate (NFC) sources at two rumen-degradable protein (RDP) levels in the diet on apparent total-tract nutrient digestibility, manure production and nitrogen (N) excretion in dairy cows?”. This is relevant because most of the N ingested by dairy cows is excreted, resulting in negative effects on environmental quality. The second question is, “Is phenotypic residual feed intake (pRFI) correlated with feed efficiency, N use efficiency, and metabolic energy losses (via urinary N and enteric CH4) in dairy cows?”. The pRFI is the difference between what an animal is expected to eat, given its level of productivity, and what it actually eats. The goal was to determine whether production of CH4, urinary N or fecal N is a driver of pRFI.

This experiment was conducted at the Dairy Cattle Center of University of Wisconsin-Madison. The use and care of animals was approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Research Animal and Resource Committee.

Prior to the beginning of the study, 24 multiparous Holstein dairy cows were trained for 7 days to adapt to the GreenFeed (C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) system: a mobile, open circuit gas quantification system that measures CH4 emission with minimal animal disturbance (Dorich et al., 2015). The machine continuously analyzes the CH4 concentration from the exhaled air when the cow consumes delivered feed treats at the trough of the unit. During the GreenFeed adaptation, the 24 cows were fed the herd diet once daily at 0730 h. At each training, each cow was assigned with a score of 1 to 5 depending on how well the cow adapted to the GreenFeed unit (1 = poor; 5 = very good). After the 7-day adaptation to the equipment, the 18 cows that adapted best (18 highest total scores) to the system were selected to conduct the study. All 18 cows were fed the same herd diet during the week before the commencement of this study.

The eighteen cows in the experiment were 148 ±10 days in milk, 3 ± 0.6 parity, 42.3 ± 4.1 kg/day milk yield, 644 ± 41kg body weight (BW) at the commencement of the study (mean + standard deviation). Cows were housed in a tie-stall barn and fed once (starting at 0730 h) and milked twice (0430 and 1630 h) daily. All cows were injected with 500 mg of bST (Posilac; Monsanto, St. Louis, MO) at the beginning of experiment and at 14-day intervals throughout the experiment. The experiment was conducted as a split-plot study. Subplot treatments were 3 refined NFC treatments: 10% refined starch (S), 5% dextrose, 5% refined starch (H), and 10% dextrose (D), as percent of dietary dry matter (DM). Both refined starch (Cargill, Minneapolis, MN) and dextrose (ADM, Decatur, IL) were food-grade products refined from corn starch. The NFC treatments were randomly allocated in three 3 x 3 Latin squares with 3 cows per square. The replicated Latin squares were then randomly assigned to either 11% rumen degradable protein (RDP), 5% rumen un-degraded protein (RUP) (11:5 RDP:RUP ratio) or 9% RDP, 7% RUP (9:7 RDP:RUP ratio), respectively (on a DM basis) in a completely randomized design. The treatments differing in RDP:RUP ratios were achieved by substitution of soybean meal with expeller soybean meal (SoyPLUS, West Central Soy, Ralston, IA) and blood meal. The feeding periods were 28 days in length, with 14 days for adaptation and 14 days for sample collection. The milk production for cows that were fed 11:5 and 9:7 RDP:RUP ratio diets were 43.1 and 41.3 kg/d, respectively.

Experimental diets were offered as total mixed ration (TMR) composed of forage and concentrate at 61:39 ratio (DM basis). The diets were formulated to contain the same concentration of forage (alfalfa silage, corn silage, and wheat straw), to be iso-nitrogenous, and to contain similar concentration of NFC and neutral detergent fiber (NDF). The concentrate for each diet was fed as a customized premix. Due to the availability of forages, different cuts of alfalfa silage were used for each period and corn silage was changed at the beginning of the third period. Due to the minor differences in chemical compositions such as CP and NDF among cuts, the diets were adjusted at the beginning of each period to standardize the chemical compositions.

The cows were fed at 0730 h during the first 2 weeks of each period, whereas during the 3rd and 4th weeks of each period, the 9:7 and 11:5 RDP:RUP ratio diets were offered once daily at 0730 and 0900 h, respectively. The enteric CH4 measurement was staggered between the cows fed the two RDP:RUP ratios accordingly due to the time needed for feed delivery and measurement of CH4 from each RDP:RUP ratio group. All cows were fed ad libitum with TMR adjusted daily to yield 10% orts. The TMR for all the diets were sampled weekly, refusal samples from each of the 18 cows were collected daily during the 3rd and 4th weeks of each period. Forages were sampled for moisture weekly and adjustment in diet was made accordingly to keep the offered diets consistent in each period. All feed samples were stored at -20 oC until dried for further analysis.

Milk yield was recorded daily and milk samples were collected for 4 consecutive milkings from day 18 to day 20, and day 25 to day 27 in each period. Milk was analyzed for milk solids (fat, true protein, and lactose) and milk urea-nitrogen (MUN) concentrations with infrared analysis (Agsource Milk Analysis Laboratory, Menomonie, WI) with a Foss FT6000 (Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark). The fat-and-protein-corrected milk (FPCM) was computed based on the equations of International Dairy Federation (IDF, 2015). Body weight (BW) of the cows was taken at 0630 h on days 18,19, 25 and 26 of each period and averaged by week to represent the BW of the cow for the respective week. The average BW of two measurements during the 4th week for each cow was used in estimating the daily urine volume. Feed efficiency (FE) was calculated as FPCM divided by DMI. Dietary nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) was calculated as total nitrogen in milk divided by nitrogen intake (kg of milk true protein/6.38) / (kg of DMI × dietary CP %/6.25).

Eleven spot samplings of enteric CH4 spread over the 24 h feeding cycle were conducted over a 4-day interval during the 3rd week of each period for each cow. The GreenFeed unit was moved from cow to cow fed the same dietary treatment in random order with a minimum of 5 minutes measurement, and 2 minutes interval between samplings for background gas concentration determination. At each sampling, concentrate mix of the corresponding RDP:RUP ratio was delivered into the feed trough to keep the cow’s head inside the trough during analysis of the exhaled breath of the cow. For each sampling, approximately 100 g of concentrate mix was delivered. This amount is less than 2% of the total daily DMI and thus was not included in the DMI calculation, however, it may introduce a source of variation in the substrate available for CH4 production. As a result, CH4 emission measurement was conducted at 1, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 10, 11.5, 13, 14.5, 16, 17.5, and 22.5 h after feeding for both groups of cows. Morning milking was between 5.5 and 10 h; evening milking was between 17.5 and 22.5 h. The GreenFeed unit was zero- and span-calibrated before the start of each sampling period with pure nitrogen carrier gas, CH4 and CO2 (474 and 4497 ppm, respectively). The daily enteric CH4 emission was calculated as the average of the 11 spot samplings for each cow. The hourly emission rate was calculated as the CH4 emission at each of the 11 spot samplings divided by 24.

Feed samples were dried at 60 oC in a forced draft oven for 48 hours. Dried samples were then ground to pass a 1-mm Wiley mill screen (Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA). Each feed ingredient (alfalfa silage, corn silage, wheat straw, and concentrate mixes) was composited by the last 2 weeks of each period. Samples were analyzed at Dairyland Laboratories (Arcadia, WI) for nutrient composition. All feed samples were analyzed for total N (AOAC, 1995), amylase-treated NDF (Mertens et al., 2002), ADF and lignin (AOAC, 2000), ether extract (Thiex et al., 2003), ash and OM (Thiex et al., 2012). In addition, starch and water-soluble carbohydrate content of feed samples were analyzed according to Vidal et al. (2009) and Deriaz (1961), respectively. In-situ ruminal incubation was done for each feed ingredient, refusals and fecal samples using 2 ruminally cannulated cows to determine indigestible NDF (iNDF). Duplicate bags were inserted into a nylon laundry mesh bag (38.1 cm x 45.7 cm) (Home Products International, Chicago, IL), which was inserted into the rumen via the rumen cannula of each cow. After 288 hours of incubation, the mesh bags were taken out of the rumen and submerged in cold water and rinsed to remove particles on the surface of bags. Bags were then rinsed with washing machine with cold water for two 12-min rinse cycles. After dried at 55 ºC in a forced-air oven, the bags were washed with α-amylase (Sigma chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) and sodium sulfide to determine the iNDF using an Ankom 200 Fiber Analyzer (Ankom Technology, Fairport, NY).

Blood samples (~10 mL) were collected for each cow from the coccygeal venipuncture with Vacutainer tubes at 4 h after feeding on day 26 of each period. The blood samples were immediately centrifuged at 10,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 minutes and the serum fraction was analyzed for urea nitrogen concentration (SUN, serum urea-nitrogen) with a 96-well plate reader (Synergy H1 Multi-Mode Reader, BioTek, Winooski, VT).

Ruminal fluid of each cow was collected by rumenocentesis at 4 h after feeding on day 27 and day 28 of each period for cows on the 9:7 and 11:5 RDP:RUP ratio diets, respectively, according to the procedure by Nordlund and Garrett (1994). Approximately 10 mL of ruminal fluid was taken from the ventral sac area of the rumen and instantly tested for pH (Laqua Twin pH-meter model B-713; Spectrum Technologies Inc., Plainfield, IL). Then 1-mL aliquots of ruminal fluid were pipetted into microfuge tubes, acidified with 50% trichloroacetic acid solution and stored at - 20 °C for later analysis. For determination of the concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA), the frozen samples were thawed to room temperature and centrifuged at 10,000 × g at 4 °C for 3 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to gas-chromatography (GC) vials for analysis of VFA concentration using GC (Clarus 500 Gas Chromatograph, PerkinElmer Inc. Shelton, CT). Ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration of the ruminal fluid was analyzed by a procedure modified from Chaney and Marbach (1962).

Spot urine and feces samples from each cow were collected during the 4th week of each period. The urine and feces were collected at 6 time points on 4-hour intervals to cover the 24 h clock over 3 days (2 spot samples per day for a total of 6 samples for each cow). The urine was obtained through vulval stimulation. Urine samples were acidified with 0.072 M H2SO4 with a 4:1 ratio of acid to urine by volume. At each fecal sampling, approximately 100 g of fresh feces were collected from the rectum of the cow and the feces from the 6 spot samplings were composited for each cow. Both collected urine and feces samples were frozen at -20 °C for later analysis. After thawing at room temperature, urine samples were composited for each cow by period and analyzed for total N (Leco FP-2000 Nitrogen Analyzer, Leco Instruments Inc., St. Joseph, MI). In addition, urinary urea-nitrogen (UUN) concentration and creatinine concentration was analyzed with a colorimetric assay and a picric acid assay (Oser, 1965) adapted to flow-injection analysis, respectively, both using Lachat Quik-Chem 8000 FIA (Lachat Instruments, Milwaukee, WI). Total daily urine volume was estimated with creatinine as internal marker, and using the constant creatinine excretion rate of 29 mg/kg of BW from the 4th week according to Valadares et al. (1999). Concentrations of allantoin and uric acid in urine samples were determined by a colorimetric method (Chen and Gomes, 1992) and InfinityTM uric acid liquid stable reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Middletown, VA), respectively, both with a 96-well plate reader (Synergy H1 Multi-Mode Reader, BioTek, Winooski, VT). Urinary allantoin and uric acid excretions were calculated from the respective concentrations multiplied by estimated total daily urine volume. Urinary purine derivatives (PD) were calculated as the sum of daily allantoin and uric acid excreted in the urine. Fecal samples of each cow were dried at 60 °C in a forced draft oven until for 96 h and then ground through 1-mm Wiley mill screen (Arthur H. Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA), and analyzed for fecal NDF (with Ankom instrument described above), fecal starch (Vidal et al., 2009) (Dairyland Laboratories, Arcadia, WI), and total N (Leco FP-2000 Nitrogen Analyzer). Fecal crude protein (CP) was calculated as fecal total nitrogen * 6.25. Manure N was calculated as the sum of fecal N and urinary N. Nitrogen retained was calculated as the difference between N intake and N excretion (milk true protein N, fecal N, and urinary N). In addition to iNDF content, feces were also analyzed for total ash by igniting the dry, ground feces sample in a furnace at 600 ºC for 2 hours, the same method used to determine ash in feed samples. Fecal organic matter (OM) was calculated as the difference between feces DM output and ash in feces.

Indigestible NDF served as an internal marker for estimation of feces DM output and in determination of amount of nutrient digested. The marker method was based on the assumption that iNDF present in feed consumed is not digested by the cow and thus equals the amount of iNDF excreted in feces. The iNDF intake is calculated from the iNDF concentration in feed ingredients (measured using the 288-hour rumen incubation described above), multiplied by the daily DMI for each cow. Feces output (DM basis) was estimated with iNDF intake divided by iNDF concentration in feces, which was also determined from the rumen incubation (Cochran et al., 1986). The amount of nutrient intake (OM, NDF, CP, and starch) was calculated from the respective nutrient concentration in feed ingredient multiplied by DMI. Amount of nutrient apparently digested was calculated as the difference of nutrient intake and nutrient in feces for each cow in each period. Total-tract apparent digestibility of nutrients was determined from amount of nutrient in fecal excretion and daily nutrient intake during the 4th week of each period.

This experiment was part of “Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Dairy Production Systems of the Great Lakes Region,” also known as the Dairy Coordinated Agricultural Project (Dairy CAP), funded by the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (award number 2013-68002-20525). The main goal of the Dairy CAP is to improve understanding of the magnitudes and controlling factors over GHG emissions from dairy production in the Great Lakes region. Using this knowledge, the Dairy CAP has improved life cycle analysis (LCA) of GHG production by Great Lakes dairy farms, developing farm management tools, and conducting extension, education and outreach activities.

Dataset Info

These fields are compatible with DCAT, an RDF vocabulary designed to facilitate interoperability between data catalogs published on the Web.
Barford, Carol
Sun, Fei
Aguerre, Matias, J.
Wattiaux, Michel A.
Product Type
Spatial / Geographical Coverage Location
S8822 Sunset Dr, Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578
Temporal Coverage
Equipment or Software Used
Intended Use
This dataset provides basic information on the response of milk production, animal nitrogen balance, and methane emission to dietary changes, especially changing protein and starch levels. The information can be used to modify dairy cow diets to achieve environmental quality goals. The data can also be used to parameterize statistical or simulation models of dairy cow metabolism or production performance, to investigate further questions about optimal feeding and treatment of the animals.
Use Limitations
The data are specific to the breed, age, parity and housing conditions of the animals in the experiment, and should be extrapolated to other contexts with care.
Ag Data Commons
Contact Name
Barford, Carol
Contact Email
Public Access Level
Primary Article

Sun, F., Aguerre, M.J., & Wattiaux, M.A. (2019). Starch and dextrose at 2 levels of rumen-degradable protein in iso-nitrogenous diets: Effects on lactation performance, ruminal measurements, methane emission, digestibility, and nitrogen balance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(2), 1281–1293.

Methods Citation

Dorich, C., Varner, R., Pereira, A., Martineau, R., Soder, K., & Brito, A. (2015). Short communication: Use of a portable, automated, open-circuit gas quantification system and the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions in Holstein cows fed ad libitum or restricted. Journal Of Dairy Science, 98(4), 2676-2681.

AOAC International. (1995). Method 990.03: Protein (crude) in animal feed. In: Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA,.

Mertens et al. (2002). Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 85(6),1217-1240.

AOAC International. (2000). Method 973.18 : Fiber (acid detergent) and lignin in animal feed. In: Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA,. Available (2008-01-22) from: http://www.eoma.aoac.org

Thiex et al. (2003). Crude fat, diethyl ether extraction in feed, cereal grain and forage (Randall/Soxtec/Submersion Method): collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 86(5), 888-898.

Thiex et al. (2012). Determination of ash in animal feed: AOAC official method 942.05 revisited. Journal of AOAC International 95(5), 1392-1397.

Vidal, B., Rausch, K., Tumbleson, M., & Singh, V. (2009). Determining Corn Germ and Pericarp Residual Starch by Acid Hydrolysis. Cereal Chemistry Journal, 86(2), 133-135.

Deriaz, R. (1961). Routine analysis of carbohydrates and lignin in herbage. Journal Of The Science Of Food And Agriculture, 12(2), 152-160.

Nordlund, K.V. & Garrett, E.F. (1994). Rumenocentesis: a technique for the diagnosis of subacute rumen acidosis in dairy herds. Bovine Practitioner 28, 104.

Chaney, A.L. & Marbach, E.P. (1962). Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8, 130-132.

Valadares, R., Broderick, G., Filho, S., & Clayton, M. (1999). Effect of Replacing Alfalfa Silage with High Moisture Corn on Ruminal Protein Synthesis Estimated from Excretion of Total Purine Derivatives. Journal Of Dairy Science, 82(12), 2686-2696.

Cochran, R., Adams, D., Wallace, J., & Galyean, M. (1986). Predicting Digestibility of Different Diets with Internal Markers: Evaluation of Four Potential Markers. Journal Of Animal Science, 63(5), 1476-1483.

Oser, B.L. (1965). Hawk’s Physiological Chemistry. 14th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Chen, X.B. & Gomes, M.J. (1992). Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives- An overview of the technical details. Rowett Research Institute. University of Aberdeen, UK.

Related Content
William Hutchison
Funding Source(s)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Dataset DOI (digital object identifier)
Program Code
005:037 - Department of Agriculture - Research and Education
Bureau Code
005:20 - National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Modified Date
Release Date
Ag Data Commons Keywords: 
  • Agricultural Products
  • Animals
  • Dairy
  • Cattle
  • Agricultural Products
  • Animals
  • Dairy
  • Agricultural Products
  • Animals
  • Agricultural Products
  • Animals & Livestock
  • Animal production
  • Manure management
  • Animals & Livestock
  • Animal production
  • Animals & Livestock
  • Life Cycle Assessment
  • Animals & Livestock
  • Agroecosystems & Environment
  • Agroecosystems & Environment
  • Plant and animal
State or Territory: